Black rioters and looters entered an upscale white neighborhood in St. Louis and in mob fashion appeared ready to pillage and set fire to the McCloskey’s home.
In order to prevent a burning of their home, the McCloskeys (white) appeared together on their porch area bearing arms ready to defend their lives and property with deadly force. “The McCloskeys say the mob broke down a gate to the privately-owned street (there’s video of the broken gate), which means the unruly mob of around 100 was not only trespassing on private property, but had apparently broke and entered onto private property” (Nolte). No shots were fired. No one was injured. No crime was committed by the McCloskeys.
After the riot calmed down, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner (Black) has given clear signals she intends to prosecute the McCloskeys for weapons violations.
How should we view this case? The following comes to mind:
A. Malicious prosecution by the DA.
B. Abuse of process by the DA.
C. Racial animus by the DA against a white couple.
D. Political abuse by a Democrat DA against a couple exercising their right to bear arms and to protect themselves. As a Democrat the DA identifies with the Democrat Party which has an agenda to appeal the 2nd Amendment.
E. Misfeasance – the abuse of authority.
F. Malfeasance – wrongdoing especially by a public official.
G. Violation of the DA’s oath of office to support the constitution, to protect the rights of citizens, and to prosecute wrongdoers.
NikeInsights /SB/ 7-21-202
Recent Comments