Ted Cruz is smart (Valdictorian), talented, conservative, professes to be a Christian, and has an impressive resume.
But, do you really want the man as president of the United States . . . or is that “UNITED STATES, INC.”?
Here are some reasons Ted Cruz is not a desirable candidate:
First, his father, Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, was a Cuban who fought along Castro before he fled from the viciousness of the communist regime. This is not necessarily a negative, only a fact to be known.
In international law, a son’s citizenship follows the status of HIS FATHER . . . NOT HIS MOTHER. This is also consistent with Biblical law. Ted’s father was a Cuban. He is, by international law, a Cuban. The same is true of Mark Rubio.
Second, Ted Cruz is ineligible to run for the office of President. Ted is a Canadian-born, statutized U.S. citizen that does not have constitutional authority to be president. His birth certificate is Canadian. “Hey, we all like Canadians,” but in American law only a “natural born” American citizen is qualified to run for president.
The senator’s real name is Rafael Edward Cruz born on December 22, 1970 in Calgary Canada. He had a choice to assert Cuban, Canadian, or U.S. citizenship. His mother registered him with the U.S. consulate, and in 1986 he received a U.S. Passport in order to travel to England for a high school trip; that is, he has emotional / loyalty ties to Canada, England, . . . and the English Crown.
In 2014, Cruz renounced his dual Canadian citizenship, though his eligibility to run for president was not in jeopardy . . . according to Cruz. We presently have a president with ties to the UN, Islam, and Mecca. Do we really want another foreign international globalist running this country?
Third, as an attorney from Harvard, Ted Cruz is a member of the BAR (the British Accrediting Regency) whose association has a sworn duty is to the British Crown, the city-state of Westminster, in London. Do you really want a British subject to be president of the United States? Isn’t this what the American Revolution was all about–and, didn’t the British trap America into two world wars?
Fourth, the original 13th Amendment of the Constitution, later expunged and replaced by members of the BAR, forbid “esquires” from holding political office because of their sworn oath to the Crown. Here is a man that won’t hesitate to use statutory law against native-born American Nationals. He is British in his thinking with “rule by law” on his mind.
Fifth, Ted Cruz is a statist that appears to view government as some kind of god which people should obey. When the militia in Oregon resisted the BLM takeover of Western Oregon, Senator Cruz told them to “stand down” and let the will of the federal government be done. The federal government is a corporation, and every American has a right and a duty to resist tyranny.
Sixth, when Ted Cruz was asked about his stand on imminent domain in 2013 regarding immigration and a proposed fence in Texas, Cruz responded, ““The Constitution also provides that property can be taken with due process of law and just compensation, and with respect to securing the borders, it is a national security issue.” What? Property taken without due process? And, where is that in the Constitution? Sounds like King George reincarnated, the very thing Americans protested in 1776.
This tells us the ONE THING LACKING that makes Cruz an undesirable candidate for president. From Top to Bottom, Inside and Out, he asserts little fidelity to the constitution; that is, he expresses few concerns about restraining government to serve within the limits of the federal contract (1788; 1791). What thinking American would vote for a candidate that shows little knowledge of concern about the authority of America’s founding documents?
Seventh, he is against a government sponsored comprehensive health care plan while he and his family have a “Cadillac plan” from Goldman Sachs; that is, non-government workers are getting the crumbs while government employees are eating the cake.
Eighth, his wife, Heidi Cruz, has a history of depression, and is / was employed with Goldman Sachs; that is, Cruz is connected to the Big Banks a.k.a. the Banksters who used semantic deceit to take control of American commerce. Remember, it was Frankly D. Roosevelt’s ties with the Banksters that made unconsenting citizens securities for the U.S. debt.
Ninth, Ted Cruz is in favor of abolishing the IRS (that’s good) and instituting a “flat tax system” (that’s bad). The United States of America is a for-profit, parasite corporation sucking the blood out of the American people. Cruz wants to establish a “flat tax,” but where is that power granted in the Constitution? By what authority does a president, or Congress for that matter, have to nullify constitutional provisions regarding taxation and to adopt alien law and apply it towards a mandatory purchase tax. Isn’t this what got us into a tax mess to begin with—scorning the united States Organic Constitution by “representatives” charged with limiting the national government according to the original contract?
Tenth, Ted Cruz, professes to be a Christian, but with a huge combined salary of a Senator and his wife’s salary at Goldman Sachs, the Cruz family has tithed less than 1 % of their income to the Lord’s work. Actions speak louder than words. His meager tithe may be indicative of his meager commitment to the authority of the Word of God.
Cruz has a head, but does he have a heart? Like Obama, Cruz is painful to listen to as he doesn’t connect socially like Trump or a Ben Carson.
Posted 2/11/2016
By Storm Brooks
Recent Comments