Q: Do you know the difference between a mosquito and a lawyer?
A: One is an insect, the other is a bloodsucking parasite.
Lawyers are generally souless men with no conscience.
A good example of lawyer twisting is Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney fired in 2017 by President Trump.
When asked about “Trump Obstruction,” Bharara stated there is ‘Absolutely evidence’ to begin an obstruction case against Trump . . . at least start a case (to go fishing for dirt). He then added, but “no one knows whether there is a provable case for obstruction.” (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/11/preet-bharara-absolutely-evidence-to-begin-obstruction-case-against-trump.html).
What a scumbag! By creating a presumption of wrong going . . . he unleashed the media wolfpack on Trump.
But, here is the kicker. He went on to state, ““There’s no basis to say there’s no obstruction.”
A well-trained lawyer, like Bharara, knows that know one can prove a negative . . . which is an effective technique to get people on the defensive.
There’s no basis to say that you are not an adulterer.
There is no basis to say you haven’t stopped beating your wife.
There is no basis to say you are not embezzling money from your boss.
There is no basis to say you are not a liar . . . or thief . . . or tax cheat.
No one can prove a negative, and this lawyer knows it. But, using the negative, the media will jump in like a pack of starving dogs demanding Trump prove something he did not do.
This kind of argument is what lawyers do in court. It is very effective as it stirs up a defendant and gets him on the defensive.
Do you think there’s enough evidence to at least start a case that Bharara is a corrupt, crooked lawyer?
We could then demand that Bharara prove he is not a dirty, deceptive scumbag.
No wonder Jesus said, “Woe unto you lawyers.”
Storm Brooks
Posted 6/11/2017
Recent Comments