Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Homo-marriage Ruling on June 26, 2015

OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL

By Dr. Brook Stockton

Posted 6-27-2015

Isaiah 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

Luke 11:52 Woe to you lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge. You did not enter (God’s kingdom) yourselves, and you hindered those who were entering.”

Errors of the Supremes:

1. The Supremes made “Gay Marriage” a 14^th Amendment issue and not a “God-given rights” issue (Declaration of Independence); a legislative matter rather than a theological matter. The 14th Amendment deals with legal persons, not human beings.
2. The Supremes usurped the place of a god and declared right what the LORD God declared wrong (Leviticus 18).
3. The Supremes abandoned the nation’s Christian history which declares the Lordship of Jesus Christ and homosexuality a crime.
4. The Supremes are guilty of manufacturing “rights” that are not mentioned in the 14^th Amendment or anywhere else in the Constitution.
5. The Supremes opened the gates of hell by declaring homosexuality, a mortal sin, a human right. Homosexuality, is not a right to be protected, but a crime worthy of punishment. It is one of the sins listed that bar men from the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9).
6. The Supremes redefined marriage in opposition to the laws of nature and nature’s God.
7. By declaring legal what God has declared unlawful, the Supremes declared war on heaven and God’s law-order. Thus, the Supremes joined the rebellion in Psalm 2.
8. Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush erred saying that the Supreme Court should have allowed the states to decide. Sorry, Jeb, the States are not gods. The LORD God has already made this decision and you are committing idolatry and  contempt of the Superior Court of Heaven.
9. The Supremes erred in not striking down the States’ decision to license queer marriages; that is, for making legal what God declared unlawful. Likewise, Christians error when they think Congress or the Supremes are the source of law. The LORD God is the Source of law for Christians (James 4:12), and any honoring of man-made statutes as law is an act of idolatry.
10. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry of innocence. The Petitioners argued that they did not seek to devalue marriage, but to obtain State “privileges” belonging only to married people; but, they did deface, devalue, and dishonor marriage by attacking its foundation (Genesis 2) and redefining it.
11. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry that “change is good;” that the institution of marriage has undergone positive changes; e.g., coverture and arranged marriages; and that new, modern queer insights will produce even more positive changes in the institution of marriage. The Supremes opened the door to bigamy, polygamy, and every other “gimme, gimme” that sinners demand.
12. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry that shifts in “public attitudes” justify the decriminalization of Sodomy; and, by acting as legislators instead of judges.
13. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry “the 14^th Amendment’s Due Process Clause extend to certain personal choices central to individual dignity and autonomy,” and that “Courts must exercise reasoned judgment in identifying interests of the person so fundamental that the State must accord them its respect.” There is nothing dignified or respectful about Sodomy or Lesbianism. It is dirty, filthy, and crass.
14. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry that, “The first premise of this Court’s relevant precedents is that the right to personal choice regarding marriage is inherent in the concept of individual autonomy” because they premise contains a redacted definition of marriage.
15. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry that, “this Court’s jurisprudence is that the right to marry is fundamental because it supports a two-person union unlike any other in its importance to the committed individuals.” Marriage is not and never has been a marriage between two persons. A marriage is between one man and one woman.
16. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry that, “Same-sex couples have the same right as opposite-sex couples to enjoy intimate association.” Rights come from God, not government; from the LORD God not the State; that is, there is no God-given right to sin and Sodomize another.
17. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry that, “A third basis for protecting the right to marry is that it safeguards children and families and thus draws meaning from related rights of child-rearing, procreation, and education.” The Supremes should have condemned adoption of children by queers and not legitimize what God has declared unlawful.
18. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry “the Nation’s traditions make clear that marriage is a keystone of the Nation’s social order.” This would be true, if the Supremes had retained the tradition definition of marriage and denied that queer unions are somehow normal or even desirable.
19. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry that, “There is no difference between same- and opposite-sex couples with respect to this principle, yet same-sex couples are denied the constellation of benefits.” Nonsense! 14^th Amendment benefits assumed there was a working father (and mother) who was spending his income to rear his children. Queers don’t have children and are self-centered and self-consumed.
20. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry that queers “are guaranteed 14^th Amendment protection.” First, the 14^th Amendment does not recognize Sodomy as a right. Sodomy is not a right, it is a behavior to be condemned. Thieves, liars, and queers do not deserve protection, but punishment.  In fact, God’s Word calls Sodomites “dogs.” It doesn’t even recognize them as members of the human race (Deuteronomy 23:18).
21. The Supremes error by accepting the sophistry that, “the right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of the person, and under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the 14^th.” Yes, marriage of one man and one woman is a God-given right, but Sodomy and lesbianism is a crime, not a right.
22. The Supremes work from a flawed definition of “religion,” to include only values from “theistic faiths,” conveniently avoiding the fact that all human values, good or bad, flow out of one’s personal religious views about the meaning of life; that is, all men are religions whether or not they are theistic; and, what the Supreme Court did was choose the religion of Sodomites and lesbians over Christian values. . Adopt a religion and then don’t call it a religion. Very slick indeed! Again, the Supreme Court manipulates definitions for a political agenda. “Woe to you lawyers,” lamented Jesus, “You have taken away the key of knowledge” by manipulating the definition of words. Consequently, there is no meaning of words, and no rule of law.

The Supremes, by this decision, fundamentally changed America into a hell hole where there are no absolutes and every wickedness can be indulged simply by declaring it a right of man.

But, the good news is that this ruling is already null and void by the fact it is contrary to the laws of nature and nature’s God:

“All acts of legislature apparently contrary to natural right and just are, in our laws, and must be in the nature of things, considered as void. The laws of nature are the laws of God; Whose authority can be superseded by no power on earth. A legislature must not obstruct our obedience to him from whose punishments they cannot protect us. All human constitutions, which contradict his laws, we are in conscience bound to disobey. Such have been the adjudications of our courts of Justice.” (cited 8 Co. 118. a. Bonham’s case. Hob. 87; 7. Co. 14. a. Calvin’s case.); Robin v. Hardaway, 1 Jefferson 109, 114, 1 Va. Reports Ann. 58, 61 (1772) aff’d. Gregory v. Baugh, 29 Va. 681, 29 Va. Rep. Ann. 466, 2 Leigh 665 (1831)

Leviticus 18:22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

Be encouraged. God has not changed. His Word is righteous and true. The Supremes are not gods, and they are blatantly wrong. Consequently, the Supreme court has devalued itself and made itself an object of scorn and reproach.