Mark Rubio for President?

There are many good reasons one should like Mark Rubio. Many!

But, is this his time? Is he mature enough to be CEO of the UNITED STATES, INC.”

Consider a few Reasons Why Mark Rubio is Not Competent to Be President

First, the Cuban-American is ineligible to run for the office of the president. 

Yes, Rubio was born on American soil . . . but . . . to Cuban parents who were not legal U.S. citizens! He is an anchor baby. Thus, he is not a “naturally born” citizen.

Does American citizenship policy mean that if a plane traveling from Chili Peru to Melbourne Australia and is forced to land in Seattle due to an unexpected baby delivery that the baby is now an American citizen? An American citizen just because it was born in an American hospital to Chilean parents?

Why are anchor babies called “natural born” American citizens?

Something is radically wrong with the American electorat when Kenyans who move to Indonesia, a Cuban born in Canada, and a baby born to Cubans in the US can run for President. Most Americans are not immigrants. They were born here. Rubio’s ancestry definitely shapes his political views—views that are sometimes more pro-immigrant than pro-American.

Second, on the issue of immigration:

We are experiencing an alien invasion of Muslims with no Christian background into this country, not to mention the invasion from the south.

Rubio appears to represent globalist donors who want to use America for the world’s dumping ground for unwanted, unskilled, religious-misfits. Rubio’s immigration bill included language giving the president “unprecedented power to expand refugee resettlement,” and, during a 19 trillion dollar national debt crisis, a hole in the southern border, at a time when 90 million Americans are out of work, and American jobs have been shipped overseas.

Furthermore, there are the illegal aliens who stole their way into this country to siphon benefits belonging to native-American Citizens. And, Rubio’s policies appear to be nothing more than amnesty wrapped in semantic deceit. Will natural born Americans be better off with 20 million Muslim refugees coming to this country in the next five years?

Third, on the issues of ethics and Sodomites.

Rubio deceptively claimed his father fled Cuba because of Fidel Castro. But, records reveal his dad left the island during the regime of a prior non-communist dictator.

When a faggot asked Rubio why he wanted him to put him back in the closet, Rubio responded, ““You can live any way you want. I just believe marriage is between one man and one woman.”

I’m glad he has solid, historical beliefs about marriage!

But, “Live anyway you want?” Is this what freedom is about?

Live any way you want? What if three men want to marry each other . . . or three women? Live any way you want?

A better answer might have been. “Yes, I want your unnatural, godless, practices back in the closet away from my kids. Yes, you can be a queer. But, when you display immorality in pubic and try to thrust it down the throats of our youth, you will be confronted.”

Fourth, Rubio on the draft for women:

“I have no problem whatsoever with people of either gender serving in combat . . . I do believe that Selective Service should be opened up for both men and women in case a Draft is ever instituted.”

Cruz is correct. Drafting women is “nuts.”

It is nuts because it is against nature, against social norms, and it is pragmatically indefensible.

Women are free to play in the National Football League, but it ain’t ever gonna happen! Women are NOT equivalent to men in combat roles. It is the difference between testosterone and estrogen . . . and I’d rather have testosterone in my platoon than estrogen.

Rubio’s answer is “equality” and “political correctness” gone awry.

Rather, he should have said, “No American should be forced into the military against his will; and, it would be a fatal mistake to ask young women to serve in combat roles to bog down military objectives. Women in combat is wrong, immoral, unbiblical, unsound logic, demoralizing, and burdensome. There are other noble ways a woman can serve her country.

Fifth, Rubio does not have settled convictions.

Rubio has been nick-named “Robo Rubio” because he has memorized party slogans and campaign phrases. Unlike Trump, who speaks his mind, Rubio sites political jingles; that is, he is a parrot not a patriot.

Rubio is smart, articulate, and growing as a statesman. Personally, I would like to see him season spiritually, philosophically, legally, and politically. In time, if his convictions mature and settle, he could be an excellent leader . . . if he were a natural born American.

Finally, if Rubio does become President of the “UNITED STATES,” he will have hell to pay for those who donated to his candidacy; that is, he will be expected to serve the UN and its globalist agenda. He could be America’s Angela Merkle and David Cameron . . . and, that would be a tragedy.

Storm Brooks